The book of Genesis.
The first book of the Pentateuch.
None on site.
CCEL: Genesis (Hebrew only).
Swete LXX (Greek only).
Gateway (English only).
HTML Bible: Genesis (Hebrew and English).
HTML Bible: Genesis
(Latin Vulgate only).
Zhubert (Greek and English).
Kata Pi BHS: Genesis (Hebrew and English).
Kata Pi LXX: Genesis (Greek and English).
Sacred Texts: Genesis (polyglot).
Genesis at the OT Gateway.
Genesis in the Jewish Encyclopedia.
EJW (Peter Kirby).
Pentateuch at Kata Pi (Oesterly
Genesis from the Plymouth Brethren.
Introduction to Genesis (David Malick).
Outline of Genesis (David Malick).
The Structured Torah (Moshe Kline).
Excerpt from Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating
to the Old Testament (less complete;
Excerpt from Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating
to the Old Testament (more complete;
Assyrian and Babylonian creation account
(Enűma Eliš or Enuma Elish): Tablet
Gilgamesh (rich text file).
Augustine, On the Literal
Interpretation of Genesis in 12 books (Latin only).
The Tree of Life: Protological to Eschatological
Flood Stories from Around the World (Mark Isaak on
From Paradise to Patriarchs (Bob Deffinbaugh).
The World Before the Flood,
and The History of the Patriarchs (Alfred Edersheim).
The Macrostructure of the Abraham Story
Who Were the Hebrews? (Gerald Larue).
Sons of God and Giants (Dennis Bratcher).
The Life of Adam and Eve (Gary A. Anderson).
The Seduction of Eve (Reuven Kimelman).
Eve and Pandora Contrasted (William E. Phipps).
The Binding of Isaac (W. Dow Edgerton).
Melchizedek in the MT, LXX, and the NT (J. A. Fitzmyer).
Jewish tradition attributes the Pentateuch (that is, the books of Genesis,
Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) to Moses.
Our English title is of Greek derivation (γενεσις) and means
origin or beginning, indicating the origin of the
world, of the nations, and of the Jewish race.
The book was originally written in Hebrew, but the ancient Greek
translation known as the Septuagint
(abbreviated LXX) is also a very important witness to the text.
Many commentators on the creation account in Genesis 1.1-2.3 have noticed
that the days are structured in triads; first there are three days of creating
habitats, and then there are three days of creating creatures to inhabit
|1.1-2: In the beginning God created the heavens
and the earth. The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over
the surface of the deep, and the spirit of God was moving over the
surface of the waters.
|1.3-5: Then God said:
Let there be light; and there was light. God saw that the light was good;
and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light day,
and the darkness he called night. And there was evening and there was morning,
God said: Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the
day from the night, and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and
years; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light
on the earth; and it was so. God made the two great lights, the greater light
to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; he made the stars
also. God placed them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth,
and to govern the day and the night, and to separate the light from the
darkness; and God saw that it was good. There was evening and there was
morning, a fourth day.
|1.6-8: Then God said: Let there be an firmament in
the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.
God made the firmament, and separated the waters which were below the firmament
from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. God called
the firmament heaven. And there was evening and there was morning,
a second day.
|1.20-23: Then God said: Let
the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the
earth in the open firmament of the heavens. God created the great sea monsters
and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed after their
kind, and every winged bird after its kind; and God saw that it was good. God
blessed them, saying: Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the
seas, and let birds multiply on the earth. There was evening and there was
morning, a fifth day.
|1.9-13: Then God said: Let the waters below the
heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear; and it was
so. God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters he called
seas; and God saw that it was good. Then God said: Let the earth sprout
vegetation: plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit
after their kind with seed in them; and it was so. The earth brought forth
vegetation, plants yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit
with seed in them, after their kind; and God saw that it was good. There was
evening and there was morning, a third day.
|1.24-31: Then God said: Let
the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping
things and beasts of the earth after their kind; and it was so. God made the
beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and
everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was
good. Then God said: Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness;
and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and
over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that
creeps on the earth. God created man in his own image, in the image of God he
created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them; and God said to
them: Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over
the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living
thing that moves on the earth. Then God said: Behold, I have given you
every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and
every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; and
to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every
thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant
for food; and it was so. God saw all that he had made, and behold, it was
very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth
|2.1-3: Thus the heavens and the earth were completed,
and all their hosts. By the seventh day God completed his work which he had
done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had done.
Then God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it he rested
from all his work which God had created and made.
C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain,
chapter 5 (The Fall of Man),
page 66 of the 2001 HarperCollins paperback:
I have the deepest respect even for Pagan myths, still more for
myths in Holy Scripture.
Ibidem, same chapter and edition, pages 71-72:
What exactly happened when Man fell, we do not know;
but if it legitimate to guess, I offer the following picture—a
‘myth’ in the Socratic sense,* a not unlikely tale.
* [I].e, an account of what may have been the
historical fact. Not to be confused with ‘myth’ in Dr Niebuhr’s sense
(i.e., a symbolical representation of non-historical truth).
For long centuries God perfected the animal form which was to become
the vehicle of humanity and the image of Himself. He gave it hands whose
thumb could be applied to each of the fingers, and jaws and teeth and
throat capable of articulation, and a brain sufficiently complex to
execute all the material motions whereby rational thought is incarnated.
The creature may have existed for ages in this state before it became man:
it may even have been clever enough to make things which a modern
archaeologist would accept as proof of its humanity. But it was only an
animal because all its physical and psychical processes were directed to
purely material and natural ends. Then, in the fullness of time, God
caused to descend upon this organism, both on its psychology and physiology,
a new kind of consciousness which could say ‘I’ and ‘me’, which could
look upon itself as an object, which knew God, which could make judgements
of truth, beauty, and goodness, and which was so far above time that it could
perceive time flowing past. This new consciousness ruled and illuminated
the whole organism, flooding every part of it with light, and was not,
like ours, limited to a selection of the movements going on in one part
of the organism, namely the brain. Man was then all
C. S. Lewis, letter to Acworth dated September 13, 1951 (Captain Bernard
Acworth was an anti-evolutionary friend of his):
I have read nearly the whole of Evolution* and am glad
you sent it. I must confess it has shaken me: not in my belief in evolution,
which was of the vaguest and most intermittent kind, but in my belief that the
question was wholly unimportant. I wish I were younger. What inclines me now
to think that you may be right in regarding it as the central and radical lie
in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives is not so much your
arguments against it as the fanatical and twisted attitudes of its
* Probably an unpublished work by Acworth, called
The Lie of Evolution.
Peter Kirby (Early Jewish Writings).
Peter Kirby surveys scholars writing on the book of Genesis:
Eugene H. Maly provides this outline of Genesis with tentative ascription to
the Yahwist, Elohist, and Priestly sources. (The Jerome Biblical Commentary,
- Primitive History (1-11)
- Creation of World and Man (1:1-2:4a) (P)
- Creation of Man and Woman (2:4b-25) (J)
- The Fall (3:1-24) (J)
- Cain and Abel (4:1-16) (J)
- Genealogy of Cain (4:17-26) (J)
- Genealogy of Adam to Noah (5:1-32) (P)
- Prologue to the Flood (6:1-22) (J and P)
- The Flood (7:1-8:22) (J and P)
- The Covenant with Noah (9:1-17) (P)
- The Sons of Noah (9:18-27) (J)
- The Peopling of the Earth (10:1-32) (P and J)
- The Tower of Babel (11:1-9) (J)
- Concluding Genealogies (11:10-32) (P and J)
- The Patriarch Abraham (12:1-25:18)
- The Call of Abram (12:1-9) (J, P)
- Abram and Sarai in Egypt (12:10-20) (J)
- The Separation of Abram and Lot (13:1-18) (J, P)
- Abram and the Four Kings (14:1-24) (?)
- Promises Renewed (15:1-20) (J, E?)
- Hagar's Flight (16:1-16) (J, P)
- The Covenant of Circumcision (17:1-27) (P)
- Promise of a Son; Sodom and Gomorrah (18:1-19:38) (J)
- Abraham and Sarah in Gerar (20:1-18) (E)
- Isaac and Ishmael (21:1-21) (J and P)
- Abraham and Abimelech (21:22-34) (E)
- The Sacrifice of Isaac (22:1-24) (E, J)
- The Purchase of the Cave of Machpelah (23:1-20) (P)
- The Wife of Isaac (24:1-67) (J)
- Abraham's Descendants (25:1-18) (P and J)
- The Patriarchs Isaac and Jacob (25:19-36:43)
- The Birth of Esau and Jacob (25:19-34) (J, P)
- Isaac in Gerar and Beer-sheba (26:1-35) (J, P)
- Isaac's Blessing of Jacob (27:1-45) (J)
- Jacob's Departure for Paddan-aram (27:46-28:9) (P)
- Vision at Bethel (28:10-22) (J and E)
- Jacob's Marriages (29:1-30) (J, E?)
- Jacob's Children (29:31-30:24) (J and E)
- Jacob Outwits Laban (30:25-43) (J, E)
- Jacob's Departure (31:1-21) (E, J)
- Laban's Pursuit (31:22-42) (E, J)
- The Contract Between Jacob and Laban (31:43-32:3) (J and E)
- Preparation for the Meeting with Esau (32:4-22) (J and E)
- Jacob's Struggle with God (32:23-33) (J)
- Jacob's Meeting with Esau (33:1-20) (J, E?)
- The Rape of Dinah (34:1-31) (J and E)
- Jacob at Bethel (35:1-29) (E and P)
- The Descendants of Esau (36:1-43) (P?)
- The History of Joseph (37:1-50:26)
- Joseph Sold into Egypt (37:1-36) (J and E)
- Judah and Tamar (38:1-30) (J)
- Joseph's Temptations (39:1-23) (J)
- Joseph Interprets the Prisoners' Dreams (40:1-23) (E)
- Joseph Interprets Pharaoh's Dreams (41:1-57) (E, J)
- First Encounter of Joseph with His Brothers (42:1-38) (E, J)
- Second Journey to Egypt (43:1-34) (J, E)
- Judah's Plea for Benjamin (44:1-34) (J)
- The Recognition of Joseph (45:1-28) (J and E)
- Jacob's Journey to Egypt (46:1-34) (J, E, and P)
- The Hebrews in Egypt (47:1-31) (J and P)
- Jacob Adopts Joseph's Sons (48:1-22) (J and E, P)
- Jacob's Blessings (49:1-33) (J?)
- The Burial of Jacob and the Final Acts of Joseph (50:1-26) (J, E, and
Lasor, Hubbard, and Bush write: "The first five toledoth structure
the primeval prologue, with the major divisions set off by and clustered around
them. Thus ch. 1 is closed by 2:4a and the next unitEden and the Fallis
concluded by 5:1, which introduces the roll of Adam's descendants, setting off
2:4b-4:26 as a unit. In 6:9 the formula introduces the narrative of Noah, separating
the story of the sons of God and the daughters of men (6:1-4) and the sketch
of man's sin (vv. 5-8), both expressing the extent of the corruption leading
to the Flood. Gen. 10:1 begins the Table of Nations, setting off this repeopling
of the earth from the flood story of 6:9-9:29; 11:10 introduces the roll of
patriarchs after the Flood, setting off the Tower of Babel story in vv. 1-9."
(Old Testament Survey, pp. 69-70)
John S. Kselman writes: "The theme of God's promise (Gen. 12:1-3, 7) and
its partial or incomplete fulfillment touches both the promise of descendants
and of land. The promise of descendants is organized around a series of questions:
how will Abram (Abraham) be the father of numerous descendants when he has not
even one son? Which of his sons (Ishmael or Isaac) will be the bearer of the
promise? Will the chosen son survive to carry on the line (chaps. 22, 27)? The
partial fulfillment of the promise of descendants is recorded in the genealogy
in Gen. 46:8-27. The promise of land is also delayed in fulfillment. The ancestors
to whom Canaan is promised spend more time outside the promised land than in
it: Abraham and Sarah in Egypt (chap. 12) and Gerar (chap. 20); Isaac and Rebekah
in Gerar (chap. 26); Jacob in Haran (chaps. 29-31); Joseph in Egypt (chaps.
39-50); and Jacob, Joseph's brothers, and their families also in Egypt (chaps.
46-50)." (Harper's Bible Commentary, p. 86)
Jay G. Williams writes of the first creation story: "The liturgy ends
with the joyous assertion that after the creation of man, God rested on the
seventh day and hallowed it. The notion of a seven-day week did not originate
among the Israelites but was observed by both the Mesopotamians and the Canaanites.
Among these peoples the shabbatu was regarded as a day of evil portent
and hence as a day when all usual activity should cease. In Israel the seventh
day was regarded as a day of rejoicing. Why? Because after God created man,
he rested. That is, he ceased and desisted; he did not go on creating super
and super-super men. The seventh day is holy, because it is a reminder that
man is meant to be the dominator of the created world. He is God's vice-regent
and is responsible only to him." (Understanding the Old Testament,
Lasor, Hubbard, and Bush write: "Literary device also is found in the
names used. The correspondence of the name with the person's function or role
is striking in several instances. Adam means 'mankind' and Eve is '(she who
gives) life.' Surely, when an author of a story names the principal characters
Mankind and Life, something is conveyed about the degree of literalness intended!
Similarly Cain means 'forger (of metals)'; Enoch is connected with 'dedication,
consecration' (4:17; 5:18); Jubal with horn and trumpet (4:21); while Cain,
condemned to be a nad, a 'wanderer,' goes to live in the land of Nod,
a name transparently derived from the same Hebrew root, thus the land of wandering!
This suggests that the author is writing as an artist, a storyteller, who uses
literary device and artifice. One must endeavor to distinguish what he intends
to teach from the literary means employed." (Old Testament Survey,
Samuel Sandmel writes: "J, the oldest source interspersed in P, is the
born storyteller. He is simple and brief. He uses adjectives only when they
provide a characterization necessary to the plot. Thus, in the tale of Eve's
temptation by the serpent, he tells us that the serpent is wily; thereby we
are led to understand why the serpent does what he does. J, moreover, is a teller
of folk tales. He will relate stark tragedy, such as Cain's murder of his brother
Abel in a fit of jealousy. But like any teller of folk tales, J has a very rich
sense of humor. (It is unfortunate that the Tanak is often approached so lugubriously
that its humor and wit are neither noticed nor appreciated.) Sometimes J's humor
is broad and almost course; he portrays Rachel as sitting on the gods of her
father, and unable to rise at her father's entrance with the excuse that she
is in her menstrual period. At other times his humor is more delicate, as when
Ephron the Hittite discloses the price of the cave Abraham wants to buy with
the words, 'What are four hundred pices of silver between you and me?' J has
a fondness for puns (these are known technically as paronomasia, a term
calculated to obscure the fun in them); he tells us that the wily ('arum)
serpent disclosed to Adam that Adam was naked ('arom)." (The
Hebrew Scriptures, pp. 340-341)
J. Alberto Soggin writes: "Foremost among the biblical scholars at the
end of the last century and in the first decades of this is the figure of Hermann
Gunkel. We have already noted the fact that he was the first to introduce the
study of literary genres into Old Testament and oriental studies, a method which
is appropriate for the anonymous or even pseudonymous character of the writings.
Indeed, in the majority of cases it is the only one applicable, if a method
is to be used which is not totally alien to the material studied. Gunkel's commentary
on Genesis is fundamental to our theme; in the introduction, which is still
a classic and can be considered as setting out a basic programme, he established
that Genesis is: (i) a collection of legends, (ii) originally transmitted orally,
(iii) which had already been collected into cycles at the oral stage. However,
(iv) the sources are more the product of redactional than of creative work,
and simply furnished the pre-existent material with a framework and connections;
besides, (v) they are not the works of indivudals, whether authors or collectors,
but of schools of narrators (scholars now tend to prefer the word 'tradents').
Therefore (vi) the individual material in the collections has its own history
and its own setting, quite independently of its later position in the sources,
so that (vii) every lesser unit must be examined by itself, leaving aside its
present context." (Introduction to the Old Testament, pp. 89-90)
James King West writes: "The reader of Genesis has little difficulty recognizing
the unity which inheres in the remainder of the book, chapters 12-50. Even though
it is none too easy finding the precise literary classification with which to
distinguish these chapters from chapters 1-11 ('legend' is the more commonly
applied label), in respect to subject matter the differences are apparent. In
these chapters we find longer, sustained accounts, centering around the four
major patriarchs: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. The brief and highly compact
stories of Genesis 1-11, with their universal themes of human beginnings, here
give way to cycles of stories associated with the several Semitic fathers and
their families. In the real sense, God is still the chief actor in the drama,
but there is less anthropomorphism and more of the localized saga concerning
specific tribes and their movements, particularly as these are associated with
well-known sacred sites. Through every episode, there runs like a red thread
the theme of God's election of Israel. The pattern of promise and fulfillment,
which gives theological substance to the entire Hebrew-Christian history, is
here portrayed as having its start in God's call of Abraham. From this point
onward, the tracing of the promise, its renewal with Abraham's successive offspring
and the anticipation of its eventual fulfillment in the Israelite successes
of Canaan, is the chief concern of the patriarchal narrative." (Introduction
to the Old Testament, p. 75)
Walter Harrelson writes: "The great bulk of the remainder of the Book
of Genesis (chaps. 37-50) is concerned with one dramatic theme: God's providential
direction of the fortunes of Joseph which resulted not only in the deliverance
of the forefathers from prolonged famine in the Promised Land but also in the
multiplication of the number and the increase of the wealth of Jacob and his
descendants. The story contains materials out of the two basic traditions, J
and E, supplemented by priestly materials and by some materials brought into
the narratives for special purposes, but apparently not a part of any one of
the three narratives." (Interpreting the Old Testament, p. 67)